Home › Pennsylvania › Clearfield

Source: OSHA, DOL WHD, EPA ECHO, CFPB. Data covers most recent 5 years of federal enforcement records.

Federal Enforcement Profile: Clearfield

The enforcement landscape in Clearfield, Pennsylvania, over the past five years reveals a relatively low level of federal regulatory intervention. With an overall Heat Score of 23 out of 10, the area exhibits a moderate risk profile concerning compliance issues. The total number of violations across all agencies is 106, resulting in penalties amounting to approximately $113,162. Notably, occupational safety and health concerns appear minimal, as OSHA reported zero violations and penalties, with no fatalities recorded during this period.

Dispute Types and Enforcement Focus

The data indicates that wage-related disputes are the primary active enforcement area within Clearfield, driven predominantly by the Department of Labor (DOL). The DOL issued three wage enforcement cases, primarily involving back wages owed to workers. These cases affected a total of 86 employees, with one significant case against Mountain Laurel Healthcare and Rehabilitation, which resulted in $58,641 in back wages. The other two cases involved local businesses—Dairy Queen and Meadows Frozen Custard—though these did not result in back wages. This pattern underscores that wage disputes are the most prevalent employment-related conflicts in the region, particularly concerning employer compliance with wage laws.

Environmental and Consumer Disputes

Environmental enforcement appears minimal, with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reporting no enforcement actions or penalties in Clearfield over the last five years. Similarly, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) receives a substantial number of consumer complaints at the state level—486,781—though the specific breakdown for Clearfield is not detailed. This suggests that, at least from the federal perspective, environmental concerns and broader consumer complaints are less directly enforced or reported in the region compared to wage disputes.

Implications for Residents

For residents involved in disputes, the enforcement data highlights that employment-related issues, particularly wage disputes, are the most active area of regulatory intervention. The absence of OSHA violations suggests that occupational safety may not pose a significant risk, though this does not eliminate the importance of individual safety measures. The limited environmental enforcement indicates that environmental quality may not be a pressing concern from the federal enforcement standpoint. Nonetheless, residents should remain vigilant regarding wage rights and workplace conditions, given the noted enforcement activity.

Overall, the enforcement posture in Clearfield emphasizes a focus on wage compliance, with minimal reported violations related to occupational safety or environmental standards. Understanding the scope of federal enforcement helps residents grasp the regulatory environment and their rights when disputes arise within employment or consumer transactions.

Fight Your Dispute for $399

Professionally prepared arbitration case packets for Clearfield residents.

Start Your Case

Court litigation averages $14,000+ · 30-day money-back guarantee

Contract Disputes

Data Sources: OSHA federal inspection records, DOL Wage & Hour enforcement, EPA ECHO enforcement actions, CFPB consumer complaint database, IRS Statistics of Income, ACS Census data. Enforcement data covers the most recent 5 years.

Disclosure: BMA Law is a dispute documentation and arbitration preparation platform. We are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice or representation.